Foundersfreedom Blog

American virtue, free speech and renewal

Payback time for the Unions…and “We the People” get the bill. The Obama (non)nationalization plan continues…

Posted by foundersfreedom on April 28, 2009

The President must have learned a lot when meeting with Chavez recently.  It appears he’s stepped up the nationalization of more American companies, but of course he’s not because he and his friends in the media said so.     

The unapologetic (except when it comes to all of America’s “transgressions” to the rest of the fawning world),  fraudulent Obama administration is nationalizing American companies and giving huge amounts of ownership to the unions.  In two stories just today We the People own half of GM and the UAW gets 39%. The UAW gets 55% of Chrysler.  Did the companies do this willingly?  I can assure you they did NOT.  The Obama administration is “changing” the game.  The administration knew they would be able to do whatever they wanted once they loaned the money.   It may have fooled the typical Obama voter…

Under threat from the Treasury, the new Mob bosses in Washington, and amid the real possibility of bankruptcy, both companies are capitulating to the their new Masters in DC and the same unions that have aided them in the demise of their own industry.  What a great business plan.  A selfish union and a totally inept and inefficient government will “turn things around.”  Have we lost our minds? 

The Leftists who have captured and conquered Washington, DC have insured that their voting bloc will NEVER suffer loss.  The lock-step unions are too big to fail for the Democrat Party.  Read below to see where the unions would have the force of government behind them to force non-union suppliers to unionize if they want to stay in business.   

Remember, since “we” own it, we will be responsible for keeping all these union people working whether they make anything we want to buy, or whether they make ANYTHING AT ALL.  Get it?   As more and more people lose their jobs to this down economy (yes, the same people who now own GM), the union just got a “free ride” card and a multi-billion dollar  company to boot.

Civility is going to be hard to maintain as America crumbles under this assault on freedom and capitalism.  God help us.

From the WSJ.  Emphasis mine.

The government could be exposed to a host of conflicts and potential unintended consequences if it ends up — as now appears likely — with a controlling stake in General Motors Corp.

Under GM’s latest restructuring plan, the U.S. would get at least a 50% stake in the largest Detroit auto maker. Even without a majority stake, the government was able to use its muscle in March to oust GM Chief Executive Rick Wagoner. But such a major holding would turn GM into a sort of Government Motors, making the federal government the company’s de facto boss and bank lender.

A direct stake could create other uncomfortable conflicts: The Obama administration would be setting emissions and mileage standards for cars in Washington while having to implement them in Detroit. It also would make the government a direct partner of the United Auto Workers, which would get a 39% stake in the company under GM’s latest blueprint for survival.

A final GM plan is still many months away, and early reaction from bondholders suggests that the plan won’t come together in its current form. But even if it flops, the proposal reveals that the government, in close consultation with GM, is prepared to become more deeply immersed in the operations and rehabilitation of the auto maker.

Both the Bush and Obama administrations have grappled with how to shore up the economy without getting directly involved in running companies. They were unable to avoid an entanglement with insurer American International Group Inc., in which the government now owns an 80% stake after committing more than $170 billion in emergency relief. It will soon own more than a third of banking giant Citigroup Inc., with which it has had a sometimes-fraught relationship.

But in contrast with those cases, the GM proposal comes as part of an all-out administration effort to restructure the U.S. auto industry, including the country’s third-largest car company, Chrysler LLC.

“The big question is whether the government, as a shareholder, will be focused on GM making money, or it making clean and green cars, or whatever other political agenda they have for the auto space,” says Peter Kaufman, president and head of restructuring at investment bank Gordian Group LLC.

Administration officials dismissed suggestions that they were preparing to nationalize GM, saying that the plan put forward Monday was preliminary. “We’re supportive of this offer and of this process, but no final decisions have been made,” said one administration official.

Another official said the administration has long planned to swap the government’s debt holdings in GM for a large equity stake, but has no intentions of running the company.

Under the GM proposal to bondholders, the government would forgive $10 billion in loans to the company in return for a 50% stake, while GM’s tens of thousands of public bondholders would be asked to surrender around $24 billion in bond debt for a 10% stake.

GM continues to pursue two tracks for its turnaround — one outside bankruptcy court and one inside. One person involved in the situation says a late-May Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing by GM is “99% likely now, maybe higher.”

In either case, the government would be in a position to set policy for the company. GM is one of the largest sellers of full-size trucks and sport-utility vehicles in the world, vehicles that are notorious for fuel inefficiency. Yet such products, which include the Chevy Silverado pick-up and Cadillac Escalade SUV, have always been among the company’s most profitable. That could present the government with a painful trade-off.

Even after its restructuring, GM is expected to remain one of the country’s largest employers of unionized workers, and it also does business with thousands of union and non-union employers.

That raises such questions as whether the government would allow GM to buy parts from a supplier that has resisted organizing efforts by the UAW or other labor unions, or whether it would encourage suppliers to support UAW organizing efforts — as GM had done for several years at the union’s urging.

The Treasury’s current plan is to hold its GM ownership stake in some form of trust, say people briefed on the situation. The administration’s auto team is now drafting documents that lay out how that trust and its government-appointed trustees will manage the government’s majority stake.

Still unclear is how long the government would maintain its ownership, these people say. There are differing views in the administration, with some advocating a quick sale of the stake while others argue the government needs to take a long-term view and hold GM for a long time to get a better price. One administration official said the government would likely sell its shares gradually, but only after GM had regained its financial moorings and rebuilt its reputation.

“This ownership thing is a few-year process, three years maybe, until auto sales come back,” said one person familiar with the matter.

How and when to sell GM and whether to consider private-equity firms or foreign auto makers as potential buyers presents another set of complications.

People familiar with the situation say that for now the government appears to have decided not to solicit buyers for equity stakes in a new GM, because it doesn’t have all the information investors would want before making what would likely be a multibillion-dollar commitment.

The government is still formulating financial projections and a capital structure for the new GM, which would be slimmed down to just a few brands—most likely Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and possibly GMC, as a niche truck brand, these people say. They say documents circulating in Washington show a radically smaller GM.

“Investing in GM would involve a couple billion dollars, which is obviously not an impulse buy, so you’d want to analyze it in depth,” said investor Wilbur Ross, who owns a large auto-parts supplier called International Automotive Components. “I’d think at some price there’d be some interest, especially as you remove debt and combine” that with relief from retiree health-care obligations and real wage-and-benefit concessions.

Economists point to the government’s intervention in the U.S. railroad industry in the 1970s as the best corollary to what may now happen at GM. In that case, the government created the Consolidated Rail Corp. in 1976 to absorb rail lines from two bankruptcy carriers. The company was sold to private investors 11 years later.

Write to Neil King at neil.king@wsj.com and Jeffrey McCracken at jeff.mccracken@wsj.com

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A8B

Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit

www.djreprints.com

 

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Payback time for the Unions…and “We the People” get the bill. The Obama (non)nationalization plan continues…”

  1. […] Foreclosure Scene put an intriguing blog post on Payback time for the Unions…and "We the People" get the bill. The…Here’s a quick excerpt…owns an 80% stake after committing more than $170 billion in emergency relief. It will soon own more than a third of banking giant Citigroup… […]

  2. […] Sweetness & Light placed an interesting blog post on Payback time for the Unions…and "We the People" get the bill. The…Here’s a brief overview…once they loaned the money.   It … Civility is going to be hard to maintain as … de facto boss and bank lender. … GM and whether to… […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: